Cloud Validation in SaaS and Hybrid Environments

Cloud validation means making sure cloud systems used in regulated settings do what they should, and stay compliant over time. It’s about preserving data integrity, traceability, and audit readiness even when parts of the system are managed by someone else.

What Is Cloud Validation?

Cloud validation is the act of proving that a cloud-based system is suitable for its intended use and stays under control in a regulated environment.

In regulated industries, validation isn’t optional. Whether your system runs on servers you own or in a public cloud, you still must show it maintains accuracy, consistency, and records integrity. The cloud changes how you validate, not whether you validate.

A simple analogy, imagine you used to drive your car everywhere (on-premise). Now you use a ride-share (cloud). You don’t control the driver or the maintenance, but you still expect the ride to be safe and the route correct. That’s similar to cloud validation: you don’t control the infrastructure, but you must still ensure end-to-end performance, reliability, and compliance.

A 2024 study in pharmaceuticals emphasized this: as the industry adopts cloud technologies, traditional CSV methods must be reevaluated to preserve data integrity in environments with shared responsibility and frequent changes.

Why Cloud Validation Matters in Regulated Industries

Regulators don’t care if your system is in a data center or in the cloud. What they care about is that your data is trustworthy and your system is controlled.

A few numbers help show why this matters:

• In a KPMG report, many life sciences companies are still slow to adopt cloud for GxP systems, precisely because validation in cloud settings is more complex than on-premise.

If you skip or half-do validation, the consequences are real: audit findings, warning letters, forced remediation, or even halting production. In biotech and pharma, that’s costly, not just financially, but reputationally and in terms of patient safety.

But when done well, cloud validation helps you:

• Reduce redundant tests by leveraging vendor evidence
  
• Scale more flexibly while maintaining control
  
• Respond faster to audits because your controls and evidence are documented and traceable

The Shared Responsibility Model: Vendor vs Customer Roles

One of the big shifts when you move to cloud is splitting control. Neither party can opt out of responsibility.

Infrastructure vs Application Controls

In a cloud setup:

• The vendor handles things like physical security, servers, patching, backup infrastructure, and many parts of network security.
  
• The customer handles how the system is used: configurations, workflows, user roles, data input, and system behavior for GxP tasks.

In a SaaS model, much of the infrastructure is the vendor’s domain. But you still own the validation of your intended processes, the configuration, and how you use the system.

In IaaS/PaaS models, you might take on more, for example, you may manage middleware, databases, or container configurations.

A real-world example, a regulated company using a SaaS e-laboratory notebook doesn’t validate the cloud servers. But it must test its sample log workflows, user roles, attachments, audit trails, and how the system integrates with its instruments.

Understanding Vendor Audit Reports

Because the vendor controls infrastructure, you often rely on their audit reports as evidence of good security or operational practices. Common reports include SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and even CSA STAR.

But you can’t just accept them without review. You should:

1. Review the scope: which controls are covered?
   
2. Map vendor controls to your compliance needs
   
3. Document gaps or exceptions
   
4. Include your assessment in your audit evidence

Think of vendor reports as supporting evidence, not a substitute for your own validation.

How to Validate a SaaS or Cloud-Based System

Validating a cloud or SaaS system follows similar steps to traditional CSV, but you must adapt to change, speed, and less direct control.

Risk Assessment and Criticality

Start by assessing risk. Ask:

• What GxP processes does the system support?
  
• What data does it manage?
  
• How damaging would a failure or alteration be?

Systems tied to batch release, patient data, or regulated experiments are high risk and need full validation. Secondary systems may need only qualification.

Testing and Documentation Steps

Here’s a practical way to structure cloud CSV:

1. User Requirements (URS): what you expect the system to do.
   
2. Functional / Design Specs: how it should behave.
   
3. Vendor Documentation Review: their security, environment, test results.
   
4. Installation Qualification (IQ): check environment setup if applicable.
   
5. Operational Qualification (OQ): test system functions under normal and edge conditions.
   
6. Performance Qualification (PQ): simulate real user operations.
   
7. Validation Summary Report: tie tests to requirements, note deviations, conclusions.

Because SaaS updates are frequent, you need a change control procedure. For each new version:

• Review the release notes
  
• Assess impact on your validated functions
  
• Re-run regression tests if needed
  
• Document acceptance or remediation

Over time, this approach helps maintain a valid state.

Maintaining GxP Compliance in a Cloud Environment

Validation isn’t a one-off task. In the cloud, you must actively maintain compliance.

Here’s how:

• Version control and change monitoring: track vendor updates and assess impact
  
• Periodic review: at least annually, review system performance against your validation metrics
  
• Data integrity checks: apply ALCOA+ (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, and plus Completeness, Consistency, Enduring, Available)
  
• Access and training: regularly review permissions, logins, and training records
  
• Audit trails and records retention: ensure these extend across cloud vendor layers

Also, building systems with compliance by design helps: embedding controls into architecture instead of bolting them on later. 

Common Cloud Validation Mistakes

Even experienced teams stumble. Here are the things to watch for:

• Overtrusting vendor evidence only, without verifying for your use case
  
• Skipping or underestimating change control when updates roll out automatically
  
• Ignoring interfaces and integrations (data flows to/from other systems)
  
• Gaps in documentation, missing signature, missing revision logs
  
• Believing cloud means safe, infrastructure may be secure, but your usage might not be

Checklist for Cloud-Based CSV

Here’s a practical checklist you can adapt:

Step	Action	Who’s Accountable
1	Define intended use and GxP impact	Customer / QA
2	Qualify vendor & review audit reports	Customer / Procurement
3	Map vendor controls to compliance needs	Customer / QA
4	Perform risk assessment	Validation / QA
5	Write URS and test plan	Validation
6	Execute IQ/OQ/PQ	Validation / IT
7	Capture deviations and resolutions	Validation / QA
8	Approve validation summary	QA
9	Establish change control & versioning	Validation / IT
10	Periodic review and revalidation as needed	QA / Validation

Each line should link back to a requirement, test, or vendor control. That link is what auditors will look for.

The Future of Cloud Validation

Cloud systems and validation practices are evolving together. The future likely includes:

• Continuous validation: tools that monitor controls and flag deviations in real time
  
• Automation in evidence gathering: fewer manual reports, more system-generated logs
  
• More regulatory comfort with cloud models: especially as agencies publish new guidance
  
• Stronger vendor-customer collaboration: shared auditability, co-validation, transparent release previews

One last note, organizations that treat cloud validation as a living process, not a one-and-done project, are better prepared to handle audits and changes.

Oguz validfor